Committee sends to deputies a resolution to admit Cuba as a diocese

By Lynette Wilson
Posted Jul 9, 2018

The morning’s heavy rain didn’t stop supporters of the Episcopal Church of Cuba from attending the Episcopal Church in Cuba Committee’s final open hearing on July 9. Photo: Lynette Wilson/Episcopal News Service

[Episcopal News Service – Austin, Texas] The Episcopal Church in Cuba Committee moved forward a resolution calling on General Convention to admit the Cuban church, after a half-century breach in formal relations.

The committee sent Resolution A238, which lays out the terms for reunification, to the House of Deputies legislative calendar. It has not yet been scheduled for the floor.

[perfectpullquote align=”right” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””]Full ENS coverage of the 79th meeting of General Convention is available here.[/perfectpullquote]

Previously, the committee struggled with constitutional and canonical questions regarding whether or not convention had the power to act to bring in an existing Anglican Communion diocese and a bishop. It was during a July 7 hearing that it decided to write A238, this time calling for the 79th General Convention to admit the Episcopal Diocese of Cuba to the Episcopal Church during this convention.

The resolution recognizes that Article V, Section 1 of the constitution “does not expressly provide for creation of a new diocese from an existing Anglican Communion diocese, neither does it expressly limit or forbid General Convention from doing so.”

The committee based its reasoning in part on Resolution 1976-D004, an amendment to the White & Dykman Annotated Constitution and Canons of the Episcopal Church, which established that “all power is in the General Convention which the constitution itself does not limit.”

The resolution calls for $400,000 for support of the Cuban church’s ongoing mission and an interim body to accompany the two churches through their transition to re-unification and $50,000 to fund that work.

A heavy early morning rainstorm did not prevent people from showing up for the final open hearing of the Episcopal Church in Cuba Committee.

The Very Rev. Jose Angel Gutierrez, dean of Trinity Cathedral in Havana, expressed gratitude for the committee’s support of Cuban clergy, who, if the resolution passes, will be eligible to participate in the International Clergy Pension Plan administered by the Church Pension Fund.

He also said, in Spanish through an interpreter, that by attending General Convention and the committee meetings, he had learned a lot of about democracy and the church’s role in society. And he said it’s also become clear that reason can drown out the message of love, referring to the debate over the constitution and canons.

“I understand that we need laws and norms for the church to function, but not at the expense of love,” he said.

In testimony and later in a conversation with Episcopal News Service, the Rev. Roberto Maldonado, Latino missioner in the Diocese of Oregon and an alternate deputy to convention, said it’s important to know that it wasn’t Cuba’s decision to separate from the Episcopal Church in the 1960s. By readmitting the Cuban church, the Episcopal Church can set an example for other mainline denominations, such as United Methodists and Presbyterians, who also separated, he said.

The resolution also laments the action taken to separate the Episcopal Church from the Cuban church in 1966 by the House of Bishops in response to the geopolitics of the time.

The House of Bishops took its action in 1966 in response to the effects of the Cuban Revolution and the United States’ response. The Cuban Revolution, led by Fidel Castro, began in 1953 and lasted until President Fulgencio Batista was forced from power in 1959. Batista’s anti-communist, authoritarian government was replaced with a socialist state, which in 1965 aligned itself with the communist party.

Formerly a missionary district, the Episcopal Church of Cuba is an autonomous diocese of the Anglican Communion under the authority of the Metropolitan Council of Cuba. The council is chaired by the primates of the Anglican churches of Canada, the West Indies and the Episcopal Church. The council has overseen the church in Cuba since it separated from the U.S.-based Episcopal Church in 1967.

In 1961, Episcopal schools in Cuba had been closed and appropriated, and many clergy and their families were displaced. Some remained in Cuba; some either returned or immigrated to the United States. Some clergy who remained in Cuba were imprisoned, executed, or disappeared. Church buildings were closed and left to deteriorate. The church was polarized politically, and its clergy and lay leaders suffered. But the church continued in the living rooms of the grandmothers, who held prayer services and Bible studies in their homes. Through them is transmitted a story of pain, and of faith.

The Episcopal Church of Cuba traces its origins back to an Anglican presence beginning in 1871. Today, there are some 46 congregations and missions serving 10,000 members and the wider communities. During the 1960s, Castro’s government began cracking down on religion, jailing religious leaders and believers, and it wasn’t until Pope John Paul II’s 1998 visit to Cuba, the first ever visit by a Roman Catholic pope to the island, that the government began a move back toward tolerance of religion.

– Lynette Wilson is a reporter and managing editor of Episcopal News Service.


Comments (2)

  1. Rev. Dr. James Hargis says:

    TEC may be right, here. Cuba is slowly reopening to more freedoms. Maybe this will help. Pray the evils of communism, Castro’s oppression, etc., will now be overcome.

  2. I strongly support this resolution & commend the committee for bringing it forward in this form. I’m also grateful to Deputy Lee Alison Crawford of Vermont for her role in catalyzing the move in this direction. Lee also makes the important point that it is important to make this move now, when the political situation in Cuba is amenable to it, for that could change 3 or 6 years down the road. Using the constitution’s permissive stance toward the role of General Convention is a good route to follow. HoB & HoD should resist lawyerly arguments that this move is impossible because the constitution does not explicitly provide for the admission of an existing diocese. Moreover, we have the precedent of the admission of the Diocese of Venezuela.

Comments are closed.