Blessing rite authorized for provisional use from First Advent

By Sharon Sheridan
Posted Jul 10, 2012

Deputies line up to testify about authorizing a rite of same-gender blessing for provisional use July 10 while the Very Rev. David Thurlow, deputy from South Carolina, gives a minority report from convention’s Committee on Prayer Book, Liturgy and Church Music. The committee’s majority recommended adoption of the rite’s enabling resolution. ENS photo/Mary Frances Schjonberg

[Episcopal News Service — Indianapolis] Same-gender couples soon can have their lifelong relationships blessed using a rite approved by General Convention July 10.

In a vote by orders, the House of Deputies concurred with the House of Bishops to pass Resolution A049, which authorizes provisional use of the rite “The Witnessing and Blessing of a Lifelong Covenant” starting Dec. 2 (the first Sunday of Advent). Clergy will need the permission of their bishop under the terms of the resolution.

The motion in the House of Deputies carried by 78 percent in the clergy order, with the clergy in 85 deputations voting yes, 22 no and four divided; and 76 percent in the lay order, with laity in 86 deputations voting yes, 19 no and five divided. The bishops had approved the resolution on July 9 with a roll call vote of 111 to 41 with three abstentions.

The resolution also calls on the Standing Commission on Liturgy and Music “to conduct a review process over the next triennium, making clear that this is a work in progress,” the Rev. Ruth Meyers, deputy of the Diocese of Chicago, said in introducing the legislation to the deputies. She chaired the convention Prayer Book, Liturgy and Church Music Committee’s subcommittee on blessings and the SCLM.

The resolution directs the SCLM to include “diverse theological perspectives in the further development of the theological resource” and to invite responses from throughout the church as well as from the Anglican Communion and the church’s ecumenical partners.

The resolution states that, under existing canons, clergy can decline to preside at a blessing liturgy and says that no one “should be coerced or penalized in any manner, nor suffer any canonical disabilities” for objecting to or supporting the 77th General Convention’s action on blessings.

The Rev. Ruth Meyers, Chicago deputy, and Diocese of Vermont Bishop Thomas Ely congratulate each other July 10 after the House of Deputies supported Resolution A049 to authorize a rite of same-gender blessing for provisional use. Meyers and Ely were chair and vice chair, respectively, of the Standing Commission on Liturgy and Music, which proposed the rite to convention. ENS photo/Mary Frances Schjonberg

The liturgy “is a service of blessing for same-sex couples who are in lifelong, faithful monogamous, committed relationships,” Meyers said in a press briefing after the deputies adjourned. “With that service comes a whole package of resources.”

The resources include a theological essay, guidance on canon law, materials to prepare couples for a blessing service and teaching materials inviting all in the church “into some conversation and theological reflection, whether or not they expect their congregations will at any time be prepared to host such services of blessing,” she said.

The package currently can be found beginning on page 184 in the Blue Book. (The convention made some slight revisions to the version of the rite included in the report.)

Before the house debated the resolution, the Very Rev. David Thurlow, a member of the Prayer Book, Liturgy and Church Music Committee and a deputy of the Diocese of South Carolina, gave the deputies a minority report.

“For 2,000 years, the church has had clear teaching regarding marriage,” he said. Noting the committee’s concern about ecumenical relations in other areas, such as maintaining use of the Revised Common Lectionary, Thurlow said, “we haven’t taken heed of the universal voice of the church universal or the Anglican Communion.”

“This resolution marks a clear and significant departure — theological, doctrinal and in worship — from the doctrine, discipline and worship of Christ as this church has received them,” he said. It introduces a “new theology of human sexuality.”

During the debate, House of Deputies President Bonnie Anderson alternately called on proponents and opponents of the resolution.

“The signs outside our church say all are welcome,” said Deputy Pete Ross of the Diocese of Michigan, who urged passage. “Do we need an asterisk?”

The Rev. Charles Holt, Central Florida, commented on the unanimous house vote on a major structure resolution earlier in the session. “That actually very much moved me in a very powerful way. It was the first time I felt united with this group. But then, just a few minutes later, we’re going to receive … something that deeply divides us on very, very core values.”

“Passing this resolution,” said the Ven. David Collum, deputy of the Diocese of Albany, “is just the majority wielding power against those with minority views saying, ‘We don’t care.'”

Newark Deputy Caroline Christie explains her support of Resolution A049 to authorize a rite of same-gender blessing for provisional use July 10 during the house’s debate. ENS photo/Mary Frances Schjonberg

The Rev. Jack Zamboni, New Jersey, recalled playing the part of the “groom” in a test run of the liturgy at a Province 2 synod. “My reaction after having participated in that liturgy was that I wished [my wife] and I had had this liturgy when we were married six years ago. It’s a wonderful piece of liturgical work.”

He described how a lesbian couple in his parish, together 30 years, cried when he told them convention would consider authorizing a rite that would bless their relationship. “They had never thought it would happen in their lifetime.”

Some of the house’s young deputies recounted personal stories as they urged passage.

Newark Deputy Caroline Christie, 18, recalled wondering as a child why her two aunts couldn’t marry. “There was no difference in their relationship except that they were both women. As I grew, I began to realize it was an issue of discrimination. … Same-sex couples should be able to be blessed by the church.”

Deputy Ian Hallas, 22, of Chicago, likewise spoke about family: his sister and her civil union.

“The love that she shares with her partner is unconditional and speaks to the ideal relationships all of us should strive to have,” he said.

“I often get asked by churchgoers and non-churchgoers why I am a part of this body,” he said. “The reason I return is for my sister. I seek to assure that she not only has the same rites as myself but also the same privileges.”

Before the vote, the house engaged in a complex and lengthy parliamentary discussion following a request to divide the resolution. Ultimately, the resolution was not divided, and deputies voted to approve the whole resolution. Deputies also voted down a request to refer the resolution to the SCLM.

— Sharon Sheridan is a member of the Episcopal News Service team at General Convention.


Tags


Comments (64)

  1. Phillip O. Hamilton says:

    Education is key here. Dennis and I have been together for over 26 years. I hope and pray our love for each other, our families, loving our neighbors as ourselves and supporting those who are less fortunate will serve in a small way as a textbook for those seeking answers as to ” why in the world would two men love each other in “that” way?” I can only say when I heard the July 10th news, “Welcome, Happy Morning age to age will say.” Thank you God for all that’s been and thank you for all that will be. Thank you, too, Easter people.

  2. Please watch this video if you would like to broaden your understanding of homosexuality and what the Bible says. This young man is very well spoken and educated.

  3. Alexandra Heeter says:

    It is true that people can find passages in the bible that loosely condemn homosexuality. And yes, in those same chapters it faces all kinds of sexual acts that are not to be done including incest and bestiality. However, the bible also condemns divorce very strongly, encourages slavery and sacrifices, encourages polygamy, condemns mixed fabric clothing and shell-fish, and encourages the stoning of adulterers among other things. I’m completely for following the bible and personally am in the process of discerning priesthood. I am however against pick-and-choose bible reading. We need to realize that many of the stories were context related and had to do with specific situations. If you are going to read one verse, read the whole chapter, or better yet read the whole book. They weren’t originally divided into verses or chapters. There are things in the bible which do not apply to the current context of the world, and there are other things that do apply to the current context of the world today.
    If we are talking about the sanctity of marriage, we should be talking about the fact that more then half of marriages in the United States end in Divorce. We should not be arguing as to whether or not two people should be able to be bound together by a blessing from the Church just because they happen to be of the same gender.

  4. Wes Sedlacek says:

    It may be worthy to note that in addition to the “lengthy parliamentary discussion” before the vote, the House of Deputies also spent intentional time in prayer.

  5. Susan Forsburg says:

    My wife and I were civilly married in 2008 and our marriage was blessed in 2011. This was not only a blessing upon us as a couple but an act by the community that took our marriage and turned it into a blessing to THEM, making us part of the whole. It is a joyful thing that other couples will experience this welcome, find themselves included fully, and in that inclusion they will in turn strengthen the community. Well done, Episcopal Church.

  6. John D. Andrews says:

    “Contrary to myth, Christianity’s concept of marriage has not been set in stone since the days of Christ, but has constantly evolved as a concept and ritual. Prof. John Boswell, the late Chairman of Yale University’s history department, discovered that in addition to heterosexual marriage ceremonies in ancient Christian church liturgical documents, there were also ceremonies called the “Office of Same-Sex Union” (10th and 11th century), and the “Order for Uniting Two Men” (11th and 12th century).” The whole article is here: http://anthropologist.livejournal.com/1314574.html

  7. Joseph A. Sanches says:

    Thank God for the prophetic vision and Christian witness of the Episcopal Church.

  8. Joseph A. Sanches says:

    I thank God for the prophetic vision and Christian witness given by my sisters and brother in the Episcopal Church.

  9. Linda McClellan says:

    I was born into the Episcopal church and during my life I attended a protestant church until I met my husband at the age of 55. I came back to the apostolic church. Our priest was not allowed to perform our marriage ceremony because we had both been married more than three times, we had to have a Lutheran pastor marry us in our Episcopal church. We were allowed to have a blessing by our priest, not performed in front of the church either, after we were married for two years. My husband is now 72 and I am 61 and we have been married 6 years.

    The Bible, all of it, is God-breathed. So no matter who is the writer of whatever part of the Bible it all is from God! For me this is a sad day, I read all the comments and most of the people that are happy about it are the ones that are benefiting from it. This is tearing the Episcopal church apart by changing and twisting God’s word around to make it fit the needs of a broken world. And now even trying to learn how to argue with someone who KNOWS their Bible, sad. Two passages that come to my mind are 1Cor. 6:9 and Romans 1:26. And please read the whole chapter, it won’t change the meaning of the words at all. Thank you God for always opening another door, there are still Bible based churches. I will pray for the Episcopal church.

  10. Tiribulus (Greg) says:

    I support Dean Stewart’s position 50%. The clear teaching of of the 5th chapter of Paul’s 1st letter to the church at Corinth is that flagrant, publicly known unrepentant sin is to be met with excommunication for the love and good of the offender and the protection of the church. I more fully addressed this in a debate with somebody else about the actually biblical view of judging here: http://gregnmary.gotdns.com/judge.html The next question then becomes, IS openly embraced homosexuality included in this simply impossible to misunderstand principle? For anybody interested I promise you I will establish that it is the quintessential contemporary application. Truly friends. It is a simple matter of how seriously you take that bible.

  11. I support Dean Stewart’s position 50%. The clear teaching of of the 5th chapter of Paul’s 1st letter to the church at Corinth is that flagrant, publicly known unrepentant sin is to be met with excommunication for the love and good of the offender and the protection of the church. I more fully addressed this in a debate with somebody else about the actually biblical view of judging here: http://gregnmary.gotdns.com/judge.html The next question then becomes, IS openly embraced homosexuality included in this simply impossible to misunderstand principle? For anybody interested I promise you I will establish that it is the quintessential contemporary application. Truly friends. It is a simple matter of how seriously you take that bible.

Comments are closed.